feel you

what do you think my name is

yeah

He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.

lol

send your tumblr

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i have read not even 1 book

bro i read nothing in my life

i love it here

much more tactility

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

is this you as well

we can only engage in such a way

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

isaac newton

so at the end

its good

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yeah

we need to be deconstructing our identities

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so an active mazelike process

ion

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

idk

not their contents

no i haven't really read anything

plato

its good short few pages

what do you mean

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

barren land

you cannot feed someone truth

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.