i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
no longer writing in the third person
it is hopeful
you cannot feed someone truth
not their contents
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
sorry i am texting like a slav
have you read
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
what do you mean
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.is this you as well
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
its good
its performative
as in
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
god being the centre magnet