hello reader,
isaac newton
that looks like my instagram account
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i have read not even 1 book
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation/form
much more tactility
all that is to say
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so an active mazelike process
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
propensity within someone
its performative
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like first name
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
i dont understand magnetisation
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i love it here
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49