i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its good

which magnetises chains of pins

or never left

not their contents

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i dont understand magnetisation

so the method has to be autonomous

idk

that looks like my instagram account

isaac

so at the end

sorry i am texting like a slav

no i haven't really read anything

fw

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

is this you as well

what do you mean

propensity within someone

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

Rain, starting

IWGD

Can I see

we can only engage in such a way

Lift Analysis