2 (actually index). two is company

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

or never left

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i have read not even 1 book

so an active mazelike process

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

much more tactility

magnetisation/form

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

ion

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

its good

ahnaf abrar

as in


but really the thing should be autonomous

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

we can only engage in such a way


plato