think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

isaac newton

and the fake qualifier

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its good short few pages

propensity within someone

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i love it here

so the method has to be autonomous

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

ion

much more tactility

like first name

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

idk

we need to be deconstructing our identities

all that is to say


so an active mazelike process

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13



Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

i have read not even 1 book

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason