its good

propensity within someone

you cannot feed someone truth

not their contents

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so an active mazelike process

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

send your tumblr

...

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

2 (actually index). two is company

or never left

send link

much more tactility

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i have read not even 1 book

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

abrar?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

fw