lol
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
propensity within someone
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
thank you
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
magnetises a pin
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i was tempted to lie about my name
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
all that is to say
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
Today I felt like starting
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf abrar
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
as in
i really havent
its good short few pages
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
what do you mean