bro i read nothing in my life
you cannot feed someone truth
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
was it worth it
isaac newton
is this you as well
thank you
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i want to do that too
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
and the fake qualifier
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.i really havent
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
have you read
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
not so on: yvf(wthw)
and the fake qualifier
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
send your tumblr
idk
plato
hello reader,