bro i read nothing in my life

you cannot feed someone truth

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so at the end

was it worth it

isaac newton

is this you as well

thank you

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so the method has to be autonomous

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i want to do that too

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

and the fake qualifier


yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

i really havent

Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:

have you read

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

2 (actually index). two is company

not so on: yvf(wthw)

and the fake qualifier

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

send your tumblr

idk

plato

hello reader,