in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
was it worth it
...
like magnets
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
what do you mean
its performative
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
magnetises a pin
much more tactility
i really havent
its good
send link
and the fake qualifier
as in
bro i read nothing in my life
so at the end
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
wait what is that
i dont understand magnetisation
god being the centre magnet
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good
the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
hiding from the rain