your feed looks like my tumblr

propensity within someone

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

not their contents

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

isaac

autonomy of learning

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

is this you as well

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its performative

have you read

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you mean

whats your name?

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

fw

i was tempted to lie about my name

no i haven't really read anything

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so at the end

idk

and the fake qualifier

we can only engage in such a way

much more tactility

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1