autonomy of learning
what do you think my name is
we can only engage in such a way
so the method has to be autonomous
whats your name?
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
its good
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
sorry i am texting like a slav
plato
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
yeah
i have read not even 1 book
abrar?
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
in a post. I want to be remembered
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
Thank you, Jack
yeah
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike