much more tactility

autonomy of learning

what do you think my name is

not their contents

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

god being the centre magnet

magnetises a pin

so the method has to be autonomous

i dont understand magnetisation

no i haven't really read anything

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

its good

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

barren land

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

have you read

is this you as well

i understand

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

plato

isaac newton

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

that looks like my instagram account

yeah

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

division of reality is straying away from it