Can I see

i understand

have you read

its good

so an active mazelike process

yeah

so at the end

barren land

much more tactility

was it worth it

you cannot feed someone truth

autonomy of learning

so the method has to be autonomous

no like which do people call me

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

what do you mean

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

whats your name?

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i have read not even 1 book

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

i really havent

lol yea

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

feel you

as in