lol

autonomy of learning

and the fake qualifier

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

not their contents

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i really havent

abrar?

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

much more tactility

is this you as well

i want to do that too

not so on: yvf(wthw)

Slug

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

so an active mazelike process

I Write Goodbye Letter

bro i read nothing in my life

so at the end

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

fw

its good

idk

we want to live the knowledge too live the content