so an active mazelike process
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
what do you mean
its good
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
no i haven't really read anything
much more tactility
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
have you read
which magnetises chains of pins
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
autonomy of learning
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
plato
its good short few pages
isaac
propensity within someone
i dont understand magnetisation
ion
idk
Lift Analysis
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
your feed looks like my tumblr