my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
send your tumblr
magnetisation/form
much more tactility
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
have you read
its good
plato
its good
whats your name?
what do you mean
ion
abrar?
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.
like first name
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
bro i read nothing in my life
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
no i haven't really read anything