my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
much more tactility
lol yea
as in
propensity within someone
so the method has to be autonomous
i really havent
was it worth it
god being the centre magnet
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its performative
Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17
feel you
i really havent
which magnetises chains of pins
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!