the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
isaac
sorry i am texting like a slav
ion
its good
not their contents
division of reality is straying away from it
no i haven't really read anything
all that is to say
yeah
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
plato
and the fake qualifier
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i dont understand magnetisation
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
ahnaf abrar
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
its good short few pages
There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.