mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

Lift Analysis

i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

autonomy of learning

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so at the end

isaac newton

plato

what do you mean

yeah

its good short few pages

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

so an active mazelike process

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

i was tempted to lie about my name

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i dont understand magnetisation

no i haven't really read anything

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

i see a website