i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

isaac

i dont understand magnetisation

have you read

sorry i am texting like a slav

so the method has to be autonomous

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

which magnetises chains of pins

isaac newton

magnetises a pin

whats your name?

like magnets

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

what do you mean

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

propensity within someone

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

its good short few pages

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

lol yea

as in

god being the centre magnet

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

magnetisation/form

its good

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

or never left

autonomy of learning

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

ion