think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so at the end

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

its good short few pages

division of reality is straying away from it

barren land

much more tactility

fw

all that is to say

that looks like my instagram account

lol

its good

lol yea

i was tempted to lie about my name

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its good

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

no i haven't really read anything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

...

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

i understand