not their contents
whats your name?
was it worth it
its performative
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
magnetisation/form
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we need to be deconstructing our identities
as in
plato
isaac
lol yea
and the fake qualifier
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
like first name
or never left
division of reality is straying away from it
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
you cannot feed someone truth
so an active mazelike process
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
much more tactility
its good
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
is this you as well