idk
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so at the end
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
autonomy of learning
so the method has to be autonomous
send link
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
bro i read nothing in my life
not their contents
i really havent
propensity within someone
you cannot feed someone truth
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15
wait what is that