we can only engage in such a way

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

its good

so at the end

whats your name?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yeah

so an active mazelike process

you cannot feed someone truth

its good

idk

like first name

plato

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

its performative

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

is this you as well

much more tactility

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

its good short few pages

i really havent

i have read not even 1 book

ahnaf abrar

i dont understand magnetisation

no i haven't really read anything

Lift Analysis

magnetisation/form

i understand

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

what do you think my name is

i want to do that too