amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i understand
plato
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i want to do that too
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i have read not even 1 book
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
wait what is that
what do you think my name is
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yeah
lol
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.