okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
not their contents
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
send your tumblr
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
propensity within someone
all that is to say
its performative
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
feel you
i love it here
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
...
god being the centre magnet
...
your feed looks like my tumblr
barren land
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
its good
what do you mean
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.no like which do people call me
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
is this you as well