so at the end

so an active mazelike process

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i have read not even 1 book

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

lol

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

ahnaf abrar

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

like first name

isaac

what do you mean

IWGD

Picture

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

so the method has to be autonomous

i dont understand magnetisation

"Anyway, you're you. I mean, look at you!" she says. "You could get with anyone, anyone in the street. Really."

its good short few pages

god being the centre magnet

all that is to say

no like which do people call me

magnetises a pin

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given