there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its performative
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03
so an active mazelike process
kind of mythopoesis
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
we can only engage in such a way
i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse
"Put a blanket."
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
not their contents
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i was tempted to lie about my name
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
abrar?