not their contents
so an active mazelike process
much more tactility
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so the method has to be autonomous
autonomy of learning
division of reality is straying away from it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
like first name
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
as in
its performative
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i want to do that too
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
plato
feel you
isaac newton
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
propensity within someone
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
what do you think my name is
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
the site i am dreaming
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
wait what is that
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak