Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59


i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yeah

i have read not even 1 book

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i love it here

its good

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

have you read

much more tactility

i really havent

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

its good short few pages

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like magnets

was it worth it

bro i read nothing in my life

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

yeah

lol yea

the site i am dreaming


to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

thank you

no longer writing in the third person

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

and the fake qualifier