i dont understand magnetisation
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
lol yea
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so an active mazelike process
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
thank you
idk
feel you
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
ion
which magnetises chains of pins
that looks like my instagram account
god being the centre magnet
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
plato
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
i understand
have you read
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
much more tactility
was it worth it
its good
no i haven't really read anything
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.i was tempted to lie about my name