not their contents

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

much more tactility

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

idk

yeah

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i see a website

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

have you read

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

propensity within someone

i understand

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

feel you

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

yeah

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

god being the centre magnet

we can only engage in such a way