you cannot feed someone truth

i really havent

we can only engage in such a way

magnetisation/form

and the fake qualifier

abrar?

as in

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i have read not even 1 book

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

1

Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?


stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

Today I felt like starting

its performative

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you mean

like first name

I am below everything.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content