...

so at the end

what do you mean

we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

autonomy of learning

ahnaf abrar

i love it here

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

magnetisation/form

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

isaac

all that is to say

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

no like which do people call me

thank you

god being the centre magnet

its performative

you cannot feed someone truth

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

feel you

is this you as well

so the method has to be autonomous

2 (actually index). two is company

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

It Will Get Lighter

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason


We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.

division of reality is straying away from it

sorry i am texting like a slav

confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.