with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation/form
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i was tempted to lie about my name
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
sorry i am texting like a slav
its good
autonomy of learning
no i haven't really read anything
whats your name?
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
feel you
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
not their contents
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
division of reality is straying away from it
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
isaac newton
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
you cannot feed someone truth
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away