in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

magnetisation/form

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

idk

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

not their contents

that looks like my instagram account

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

whats your name?

no i haven't really read anything

like magnets

i understand

its performative

have you read

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

plato

2 (actually index). two is company

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

much more tactility

hello reader,

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

brb i will read and reply sincerely

its good short few pages