was it worth it
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
yeah
i have read not even 1 book
all that is to say
lol yea
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
we can only engage in such a way
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
He went in there with a camera to film it before he moved out of the building. He didn't think anyone would believe the story if he didn't have proof.
...
god being the centre magnet
like magnets
isaac newton
the site i am dreaming
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
thank you