i dont understand magnetisation

not their contents

i have read not even 1 book

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

fw

so the method has to be autonomous

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

we can only engage in such a way

send your tumblr

idk

much more tactility

autonomy of learning

lol

isaac

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

your feed looks like my tumblr

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no like which do people call me

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

and the fake qualifier

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

barren land

all that is to say

i understand

have you read

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

lol yea

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

like magnets

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos