in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
autonomy of learning
fw
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
your feed looks like my tumblr
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
which magnetises chains of pins
i dont understand magnetisation
isaac
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
all that is to say
not their contents
yeah
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
yeah
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
what do you think my name is
so the method has to be autonomous
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
yes