idk

was it worth it

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

division of reality is straying away from it

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

but really the thing should be autonomous

Rain, starting

really i want the internet

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

so an active mazelike process

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

have you read

in a post. I want to be remembered

Can I see

Garden Post-Dusk, Birds Above, In Another Life