i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

isaac

i have read not even 1 book

much more tactility

like first name

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

that looks like my instagram account

i really havent

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

we need to be deconstructing our identities

which magnetises chains of pins

you cannot feed someone truth

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

and the fake qualifier

i love it here

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

plato

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

no like which do people call me

or never left

sorry i am texting like a slav

ion

whats your name?

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

was it worth it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yeah

god being the centre magnet

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

but really the thing should be autonomous

its good