yes

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

so the method has to be autonomous

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i want to do that too

ahnaf abrar

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

but really the thing should be autonomous

as in

fw

i was tempted to lie about my name

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext


so at the end

so an active mazelike process

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

not their contents

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

plato

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

send your tumblr

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things