i have read not even 1 book

its good short few pages

so at the end

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

yeah

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

idk

ion

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

we need to be deconstructing our identities

autonomy of learning

yeah

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

fw

isaac newton

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

is everyoneback on tumblr now

as in

so the method has to be autonomous

which magnetises chains of pins

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

no i haven't really read anything

that looks like my instagram account

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i understand

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

magnetisation/form

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

or never left

wait what is that