the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
its good short few pages
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
thank you
was it worth it
feel you
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.i want to do that too
you cannot feed someone truth
bro i read nothing in my life
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
like magnets
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
not their contents
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books