i see a website
what do you mean
i really havent
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
which magnetises chains of pins
much more tactility
so an active mazelike process
its good
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
its good short few pages
was it worth it
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
...
and the fake qualifier
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
its good
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
was it worth it
Thank you, Jack
you cannot feed someone truth
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
that looks like my instagram account
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.