think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

all that is to say

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

whats your name?

magnetises a pin

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so the method has to be autonomous

no i haven't really read anything

magnetisation/form

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

like first name

fw

ion

and the fake qualifier

barren land

December 2025

and the fake qualifier

bro i read nothing in my life

feel you

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i love it here

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models