i have read not even 1 book
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
as in
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
what do you mean
abrar?
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf abrar
autonomy of learning
division of reality is straying away from it
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
propensity within someone
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
yeah
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i want to do that too
have you read
no like which do people call me
you cannot feed someone truth
i was tempted to lie about my name
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
we can only engage in such a way
lol yea
its good short few pages
so the method has to be autonomous
its good
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
fw
is this you as well
send your tumblr
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
and the fake qualifier
its good
send link
not so on: yvf(wthw)