you cannot feed someone truth

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

autonomy of learning

not their contents

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

yes

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

we can only engage in such a way

much more tactility

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

its performative

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

plato

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i dont understand magnetisation

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

plato

wait what is that

is everyoneback on tumblr now

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

have you read

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

sorry i am texting like a slav

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i have read not even 1 book

that looks like my instagram account

send link

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.