my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
its good short few pages
barren land
so the method has to be autonomous
isaac
or never left
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
have you read
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
as in
thank you
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
we need to be deconstructing our identities
fw
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
its good
sorry i am texting like a slav
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
isaac newton
autonomy of learning
what do you think my name is
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf